Question
Statements: No divider is products. Each
product is goods. Only a few service is products. Conclusions: I. All product can never be services. II. Mostly good being divider is a possibility. In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disr egarding commonly known facts.Solution
Only a few service is product (I) тЖТ All products may be services (A). Hence conclusion I does not follow.
No divider is a product (E) + Each product is good (A) тЖТ Some goods are not dividers (O) тЖТ Probable conclusion тЖТ All goods may be dividers (A). Hence conclusion II follows.
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдкреНрд░рд╢реНрди рдореЗрдВ , рдЪрд╛рд░ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдкреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ , рдЙрд╕ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк рдХрд╛ рдЪ...
тАШ рд╕рддреНрдпрдирд┐рд╖реНрдатАЩ рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рдХреМрди-рд╕рд╛ рд╣реИ ?┬а
' рдЕрдиреБрд░рдХреНрддрд┐ ' рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХреНрдпрд╛ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ ?
рд╕рдорд╕реНрдпрд╛ рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ -
рдЬреЛ рдХрднреА рдорд░рддрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ┬а
рдЕрдЧреНрдирд┐
Amount outstanding рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рд╣реА рдкрд╛рд░рд┐рднрд╛рд╖рд┐рдХ рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ ?
...NATURAL JUSTICE рдХрд╛ рдЖрд╢рдп рд╣реИ
рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдд рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдПред
рд╕рдВрдХреБрдЪрд┐рдд┬а
рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдкреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рд╕рд╛рд░реНрдердХ рд╢рдмреНрдж рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдд рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдПред