. Statements:
Some ovens are microwaves.
Only a few microwaves are toasters
No oven is a grinder
Conclusions:
I. All ovens is being toaster is a possibility
II. Some microwaves are not grinders
III. No grinder is a toaster
Some ovens are microwaves (I) + Only a few microwaves are toasters (I) → Probable conclusion → All ovens may be toasters (A). Hence conclusion I follows. Some ovens are microwaves (I) → Conversion → Some microwaves are ovens (I) + No oven is a grinder (E) → Some microwaves are not grinders (O). Hence conclusion II follows. Some ovens are microwaves (I) + Only a few microwaves are toasters (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Statements: P > Q ≤ R; Q ≥ O > S; T < S ≤ U
Conclusions:
I. T < R
II. U ≤ Q
III. P > U
...Statement: F ≥ G > I > E ≤ P, E = S ≥ P
Conclusion: I. F ≥ P II. G > P
Statements: Q > S ≥ R = T; U < V = W < X = Y ≤ T
Conclusions:
I. R > U
II. T < U
III. U ≥ R
Statements: D > E ≥ I > G; L = F < H ≤ G; L > J
Conclusions:
I. E > J
II. L ≤ D
III. I ≥ F
Statement: P > Q ≥ R = S ≤ T < U
Conclusions: I. T > Q II. U < P
...Statements: A > C > W > S ≤ M ≥ N = T
Conclusion:
I. M > C
II. S > A
Relationship between different elements is shown in the statements. Find if the conclusions also follow or not.
Statements: J ≥ Q = W ≥ D <...
Statement: M ≤ W, W < F, F = V, V ≥ C.
Conclusion: I. C > W II. M ≥ C
Statement: D < M < P = V = E ≥ T > Z
Conclusion: I. P > Z II. D > E
In the following question, a relationship between different elements is shown in the statements, followed by two conclusions I and II. Assuming the sta...