Question
In the question below there are three statements followed
by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts . Statements: Some Wf is KL Only a few Xz is KL All Xz is MN Conclusions: I. All KL being Xz is a possibility II. Some MN is WfSolution
Only a few Xz is KL β All KL may be Xz (A). Hence conclusion I follows.
Some Wf is KL (I) β Conversion β Some KL is Wf (I).
Only a few Xz is KL (I) + Some KL is Wf (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Select the option that arranges sentences B, C, D and E in a logical sequence.
Sentences A and F are static.
A. I taught a class at a tele...
Sentences of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the sentences in the right order to form a meaningful and coherent paragraph.
...
If statement F is the last statement, which of the following is the SECOND statement after rearrangement?
Which of the following represents the correct sequence in the jumbled sentence E?
Directions: Sentences of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the sentences in the correct order to form a meaningful and coherent par...
Which of the following is the fourth sentence if the passage?
Parts of a sentence are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the parts in the right order to form a meaningful sentence
A. to lift 8 million peo...
Directions: Sentences of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the sentences in the correct order to form a meaningful and coherent par...
Given below are four sentences, which are jumbled. Pick the option that gives the correct order.
P - Raju was deeply affected by a rail accident ...
1. The company official would meet
P. and the first round of talks
Q. with the Government
R. the future course of action
S. ...