Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Who is considered a Beneficial Owner under RBI KYC norms?
A company has a net profit of ₹5,00,000 and 1,00,000 equity shares outstanding at the beginning of the year. During the year, it issued 50,000 additio...
There can be variety of budget. Name the budget which relates to a particular function of the business.
Which of the following is the regulator of the capital market in India?
Which of the following ratios measures a company's profitability?
The difference between the spot price and the future price of a future is called as _____?
From the following given information, calculate inventory turnover ratio:
Revenue from operations = Rs.200,000 Average Inventory = Rs.20,000 <...
Underwriting commission for issue of shares, shall not exceed:
In the context of managerial decision-making, which of the following best describes ‘opportunity cost’?
Other things remaining the same, infusion of fresh equity will ______ the credit profile of a company.
