Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
In which of the following cases should an investor buy a bond?
At the end of the accounting year the capital expenditures are shown in the:
In relation to appointment of auditors under the Companies Act, 2013, which of the following statements are correct?
(i) Section 129 of the Compa...
Which among the following would be classified as a part of Internal Liability?
A type of market in which securities with less than one year maturity are traded, is classified as
A company has a paid-up share capital of ₹80 lakh and free reserves of ₹120 lakh. It plans to buy back 25% of its paid-up equity shares. The face va...
A person invests ₹50,000 at 12% p.a. compounded annually. Find the compound value after 3 years.
GeM is characterized by which of these three core elements?
In the merger of X Ltd. and Y Ltd., it is decided that the amalgamation will be in the nature of a merger (as per AS-14). Which of the following conditi...
According to section 2(i), “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties thereto, but not at the option of the other ...
