Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
The markets dealing with agricultural commodities at district level headquarters are called?
 A combination of contouring and crop rotation, in which alternate rows are constructed perpendicular to the direction of wind and water flow, to prev...
Kranz anatomy is found in the leaves of
Which of the following part of stomach is called “True stomach”?
When an allele of one gene hides or masks the visible output, or phenotype, of another gene it is known as:
During germination, seeds absorb water byÂ
Maximum moisture content for safe storage in wheat seed is:
Micronutrient is essential for the synthesis of Auxin:
Part of atmosphere in which maximum portion of ozone layer is located?
Grouping of two or more than two consumers for a product or service so that their needs are better served, can be defined as-
