Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
 Recently, _________ the founder of Wikileaks was released from a prison in the United Kingdom.
From Feb India became the second country to move to the T+1 stock settlement mechanism in a phased manner. Which is the 1st country?
Dinyar Contractor who recently passed away was related to which profession?
This festival was started by the Government of Nagaland in 2000 to encourage interaction among tribes and to promote the cultural heritage of the State....
Which of the following iron and steel plants is located in Jharkhand?
In Microsoft Word, which option allows you to exclude specific sections or types of text from the spelling and grammar check?
Which of the following statement is/are CORRECT about Madras High Court decision of February 2023 regarding Domestic violence case?
1. Any woman ...
World Water Day is celebrated every year in which day?
Aluna Kabuini is associated with which of the following dances?
Which of the following statements about the Constitution of India is NOT true?
