Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Lexan is a man-made polymer used for making
Which one of the following is not a ‘Greenhouse Gas’?
The rate of evaporation increases with ______.
Which is the third lightest halogen?
Which chemical compound is commonly used in baking to provide more volume and a lighter texture to baked goods?
In the vulcanization process, natural rubber is heated with which element to enhance its properties?
Which element is used in pencil leads?
Which compound/acid commonly known as Aspirin?
Which of the following oxides is soluble in water?
Which of the following is an ore of calcium?