Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Trichogramma spp acts as:
Lactose sugar of milk is converted into Lactic acid by
Classical production function, the point where elasticity of production remains zero is at:
Transpiration ratio of which of the following plants is observed to be the lowest?Â
Flame photometer is used in the determination of
Late blight and early blight of tomato is caused by which organism?
Golden rice, which is genetically modified, is rich in:
The persons who starts to adopt new practices quickly or at first are calledÂ
Among the listed grass fodder crops, which one is recognized as a perennial grass variety and referred to as "Elephant grass"?
Seeds are formed but the embryos develop without fertilization in
