Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion →  No card is a proof (E) → Conversion →   Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
RBI’s WMA limit for the Government of India for Oct 2025–Mar 2026 (H2 FY 2025–26) is fixed at:
Recently Former CM of [1] J M Rymbai died. He became the Chief Minister of [1] on June 15, 2006, and served until March 2007. What should be the correct...
What is the expected annual savings from the implementation of the 'Anna Chakra' tool?
Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi dedicated to the nation Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Helicopter Factory in which city of Karnataka?
Which country won 2021 SAFF Championship title?
Which platform is used in the pact between PhonePe and SIDBI to enable registration of informal micro enterprises?
Which city received the Ramsar Wetland City Accreditation in 2025?Â
What is the theme of the 81st plenary meeting of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)?
Barisu Kannada Dindimava’ is a culture festival of which state?
Khulna-Mongla railway line is in which country?