Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All valid are proof. All proofs are identity. None of the identity are card. Conclusions: I. Some proofs are not card. II. No identity is valid.Solution
All proofs are identity (A) + None of the identity are card (E) → No proof is a card (E) → Conversion → No card is a proof (E) → Conversion → Some proofs are not card (O). Hence conclusion I follows. All valid are proof (A) + All proofs are identity (A) → All valid are identity (A). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
According to Section 36 of the Code on Wages, 2019, what is the purpose of carrying forward excess allocable surplus or minimum bonus to the succeeding...
2 xerox copies of a will deed are ___________?
The amount payable on application on every security shall _____________of the security or such other percentage or amount, as may be specified by the Se...
Article 14 guarantees equality before law and equal protection of law to
If A carries a badge of soldier in spite of not being a soldier he is punishable as per S. 140 with?
Presumption as to electronic messages extends to:
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a committee to review the three codes of criminal law. Who was appointed as the head of this committee?
According to the IBC the liquidator shall communicate his decision of admission or rejection of claims to the creditor and corporate debtor within _____...
The documents itself produced before court is:
As per the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, under what circumstance can a Court of Sessions take cognizance of an offence as a Court of Original jur...
