📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    âš¡ Month End Offer - Flat 52% Off On All Courses! Enroll Now âš¡
    00:00:00 AM Left

    Question

    To improve workplace productivity, the management of

    XYZ Ltd. introduced a policy requiring all employees to start their day with a 30-minute team meeting. The management believes this will encourage collaboration and communication among team members, ultimately improving performance. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
    A Most employees feel more energetic and focused in the morning. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Teams that communicate better are often more productive. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Many employees report that mandatory morning meetings reduce the time they have for individual focused work. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D XYZ Ltd. has experienced improved sales over the last quarter. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E Employees are encouraged to raise work-related issues during meetings. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    The argument assumes that mandatory morning meetings will increase productivity by improving collaboration. Let’s evaluate each option: Option A: Supports the idea that mornings are good for engagement, which strengthens—not weakens—the argument. Option B: Also strengthens the argument by linking communication and productivity. Option C: Directly weakens the claim. If employees lose time for focused individual work due to meetings, then the meetings might actually reduce overall productivity, not improve it. Option D: Talks about improved sales but does not show causality linked to the meeting policy. Irrelevant. Option E: Encouraging issue-raising during meetings is neutral or supportive, not weakening.

    Practice Next
    More Strong and Weak Argument Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question