Passage:
Some education experts argue that introducing coding at the primary school level enhances logical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills in children. However, a few critics caution that children may become too dependent on screens and lose interest in physical activity and social interaction. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in favor of introducing coding at the primary level?

The argument is that coding improves logical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. We are asked to strengthen this claim. Let’s analyze the options: A) Talks about the lack of trained teachers, which might weaken, not strengthen, the argument. B) Supports the benefits of early coding by citing research, which directly strengthens the claim that coding helps with thinking and reasoning. C) Talks about concerns, not benefits – this would weaken, not strengthen. D) Mentions discipline issues, again weakening the argument. E) Is irrelevant to primary-level coding – it gives no support or contradiction to the main argument.