New Enroll in RBI Grade B New Batch - Starts on May 21

    Question

    Passage: Many nutritionists argue that school

    cafeterias should ban sugary drinks such as sodas and sweetened juices. These drinks are high in calories but provide no nutritional value, and they are a major contributor to obesity and related health issues in children. Therefore, eliminating sugary drinks from school cafeterias would improve students’ health and reduce obesity rates. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the above argument?
    A Some students prefer to bring sugary drinks from home even when they are available in the cafeteria. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Water and healthy drinks like milk are available in most school cafeterias. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Schools that have removed sugary drinks from their cafeterias have reported a noticeable drop in student obesity rates. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D The sale of sugary drinks contributes to school revenue. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E Obesity in children is often influenced by genetic and environmental factors beyond school control. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    The argument claims that banning sugary drinks from school cafeterias will improve student health and reduce obesity. Let’s evaluate each option: A) Suggests that students bring their own drinks, which does not support the idea that banning them in school helps. B) States a neutral fact — the availability of alternatives — but doesn't prove the health benefit of banning sugary drinks. C) Directly supports the claim with evidence: removing sugary drinks led to reduced obesity, which strengthens the argument. D) Brings up a financial concern that could weaken the recommendation. E) Suggests that other factors influence obesity, potentially weakening the argument. Therefore, option C is correct because it directly strengthens the link between removing sugary drinks and improving student health.

    Practice Next

    Relevant for Exams: