Question
In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges,
the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a fundamental right that requires constitutional protection. I. Privacy was earlier not considered to be a fundamental right. II. Rare unanimous verdicts are always pronounced by a bench of nine judges. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answerSolution
Since the ruling that makes privacy as a fundamental right has been introduced by Supreme Court, it means that it wasn’t a fundamental right earlier. Thus I is implicit. Nothing has been mentioned about the trend of bench of judges for unanimous verdicts, thus it is not true for always. Thus, II is not implicit.
The Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha are chosen by______________
The issue of shares by a company on a discount is prohibited and thus, it shall be ____________
Which section of CPC gives inherent powers to a civil court?
If a member of either House of Parliament is without permission absent from all meetings for sixty days, what action can the House take?
For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the intoxication:
Vested interest is not:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 came into force on__________.
Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat means_____________________
The case Badruddin Rukonddim Karpude v. State of Maharashtra relates to_____.
Which section of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 delas with the provision of Prohibition of common Directors?