📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    ⚡ Month End Offer - Flat 52% Off On All Courses! Enroll Now ⚡
    00:00:00 AM Left

    Question

    In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges,

    the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a fundamental right that requires constitutional protection. I. Privacy was earlier not considered to be a fundamental right. II. Rare unanimous verdicts are always pronounced by a bench of nine judges. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.  Give answer
    A If only assumption I is implicit Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B If only assumption II is implicit Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C If either I or II is implicit Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D If neither I nor II is implicit Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E If both I and II are implicit. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    Since the ruling that makes privacy as a fundamental right has been introduced by Supreme Court, it means that it wasn’t a fundamental right earlier. Thus I is implicit. Nothing has been mentioned about the trend of bench of judges for unanimous verdicts, thus it is not true for always. Thus, II is not implicit. 

    Practice Next
    More Statement and assumption Questions
    ask-question