Question

In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges, the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a fundamental right that requires constitutional protection.
I. Privacy was earlier not considered to be a fundamental right.
II. Rare unanimous verdicts are always pronounced by a bench of nine judges.

Q: Answer-In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges, the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy...

Since the ruling that makes privacy as a fundamental right has been introduced by Supreme Court, it means that it wasnt a fundamental right earlier. Thus I is implicit. Nothing has been mentioned about the trend of bench of judges for unanimous verdicts, thus it is not true for always. Thus, II is not implicit.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and
II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answe

A If only assumption I is implicit

B If only assumption II is implicit

C If either I or II is implicit

D If neither I nor II is implicit

E If both I and II are implicit.

Practice Next