Question
In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges,
the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a fundamental right that requires constitutional protection. I. Privacy was earlier not considered to be a fundamental right. II. Rare unanimous verdicts are always pronounced by a bench of nine judges. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answerSolution
Since the ruling that makes privacy as a fundamental right has been introduced by Supreme Court, it means that it wasn’t a fundamental right earlier. Thus I is implicit. Nothing has been mentioned about the trend of bench of judges for unanimous verdicts, thus it is not true for always. Thus, II is not implicit.
- Find the wrong number in the given number series.
12, 20, 31, 45, 62, 84 81, 154, 124, 197, 167, 235
In each of the following giving number series, a wrong number is given. Find out the wrong number?
46 23 23 34.5 70 172.5
...- Find the wrong number in the given number series.
10, 19, 3, 28, 5, 54 14 15 24 50 98 179
...Find the wrong number in the given number series.
2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 22, 34Find the wrong number in the given number series.
- 71, - 7, 43, 78, 103, 119
66, 115, 34, 155, 14, 211
11, 12, 20, 58, 234, 1168
Find the wrong number in the given number series.
21, 42, 84, 116, 132, 264