Question
In a rare unanimous verdict pronounced by nine judges,
the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a fundamental right that requires constitutional protection. I. Privacy was earlier not considered to be a fundamental right. II. Rare unanimous verdicts are always pronounced by a bench of nine judges. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answerSolution
Since the ruling that makes privacy as a fundamental right has been introduced by Supreme Court, it means that it wasn’t a fundamental right earlier. Thus I is implicit. Nothing has been mentioned about the trend of bench of judges for unanimous verdicts, thus it is not true for always. Thus, II is not implicit.Â
Under which menu heading does a balance sheet fall in Tally ERP 9?
Which of the following correctly defines a Bridge Loan?
A central PSU adopts sovereign guarantee-backed debt for a ₹2,000 crore infrastructure project. What impact will this have on its cost of capital?
Bank A/c is generally maintained in the ___?
Following information is available regarding an organization:
Direct material purchased: 1,50,000
Direct material consumed: 80,000
...
What is project financing?
Omega Ltd. has idle capacity and receives a special export order for 2,000 units at ₹420 per unit. Normal price = ₹500. Unit variable cost = ₹350....
If Selling Price is 9 per unit, variable cost is 5 per unit and fixed O/H absorption rate is 1.5 per unit, what is the break even point in Qty if the bu...
When book profits are less than taxable profits:
Under which section of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can an individual claim a deduction for the payment of Medical/Health Insurance Premium?