📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    Question

    Article 21 (Part III), Right to life and personal

    liberty, has been read with Directive Principles many times. Which of the following best states the constitutional harmony principle?
    A Directive Principles are subordinate and can never be invoked to expand Fundamental Rights. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Directive Principles may be read to widen the scope of Fundamental Rights, provided the reading does not destroy the right’s core. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Directive Principles are enforceable justiciable rights under Part III. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Directive Principles supersede Fundamental Rights when there is conflict. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E Fundamental Rights can be suspended during normal times to implement Directive Principles. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    The relationship between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) has evolved through judicial interpretation. Initially, in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951), the Supreme Court held that Fundamental Rights prevail over DPSPs. However, later jurisprudence adopted a harmonious construction approach. In Kesavananda Bharati and Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Court held that both Parts are complementary and together form the core of the Constitution’s philosophy. DPSPs may be used to interpret and expand the scope of Fundamental Rights—especially Article 21—as seen in Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation. However, DPSPs cannot override or abrogate enforceable rights, as that would destroy constitutional balance, which itself is part of the basic structure.

    Practice Next
    More Other Laws and Acts Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question