Question
The Wagan Mound Case
discusses:Solution
In order to calculate the damages remoteness test of directness was replaced with foreseeability in the Wagan Mound case. In this case a large quantity of oil was spilt into Sydney Harbour from the Wagon Mound and it drifted under the wharf where the claimants were oxyacetylene welding. The resulting fire caused extensive damage to the wharf and to vessels moored nearby. The Privy Council replaced the direct consequence test with the requirement that, in order to be recoverable, damage must be foreseeable in all the circumstances, thus, although pollution was a foreseeable consequence of the spillage, an outbreak of fire was not.
Parent Co. holds 80% in Subsidiary Co. The subsidiary reports profit of ₹10 lakh. What is the amount of minority interest in the consolidated P&L?
The accounting equation is the foundation of:
Application Controls deal with controls related to:Â
In a public sector undertaking (PSU), a 'Reasonableness of Price' certificate is often required for purchases to:
Capital asset excludes all except-
Which of the following IND AS deals with revenue from contracts with customers?
As per AS 9, revenue from sales of goods should be recognized when:
The _________ generation used integrated circuits.
In an organization, the actual sales were ₹10 lakh while the budgeted sales were ₹12 lakh. The cost was ₹6 lakh vs budgeted cost of ₹7 lakh. Wha...
The difference between the spot price and the future price of a future is called as _____?
Relevant for Exams:
