Question
Pending investigation or inquiry, the Board may attach
the bank accounts of any person associated in violation of any provisions of the Act for a maximum period ofSolution
Section 11(4) (e) of SEBI Act (e)attach, for a period not exceeding ninety days, bank accounts or other property of any intermediary or any person associated with the securities market in any manner involved in violation of any of the provisions of this Act, or the rules or the regulations made thereunder: Provided that the Board shall, within ninety days of the said attachment, obtain confirmation of the said attachment from the Special Court, established under section 26A, having jurisdiction and on such confirmation, such attachment shall continue during the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings and on conclusion of the said proceedings, the provisions of section 28A shall apply:
What is the liability of partners in a general partnership under the Partnership Act?
Which of the following is not a necessary element to constitute a tort?
What is the maximum continuous tenure a director of a banking company (other than the chairman or whole-time director) can hold office, as per the Banki...
“Any agreement entered into between enterprises engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services, which directly or indirectly ...
According to the Companies Act, what is the maximum number of public companies in which a person can be appointed as a director?
The following shall not be included in the liquidation estate assets and shall not be used for recovery in the liquidation as per the provisions laid do...
Which statement correctly describes “public duty” according to the PC Act?
In computing the period of limitation for an application to set aside an award, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be __________?
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for obtaining a patent under Indian law?
P, residing in London, via email instructs his agent Q in Delhi to forge a document. Under which provision can P be held liable for abetment?Â