Question
Three statements are given, followed by two
conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No Painter are Teacher Some Dentist are Teacher All Lawyers are Dentist Conclusions: I. All Lawyers are Painter II. Some Dentist are not PainterSolution
All Lawyers are Dentist (A) + Some Dentist are Teacher (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Dentist are Teacher (I) + No Teacher are Painter (E) → Some Dentist are not Painter (O). Hence conclusion II follows.
Who may call an Extraordinary General Meeting as per the Companies Act?
What is the wallet limit under UPI Lite, as revised by RBI recently?
The Data Link Layer of the OSI model is responsible for:
Which of the following statement is true relating to the display of name of foreign company as per the provisions contained in the Companies Act?
As per the provisions of the Companies Act when is an unregistered company deemed to be unable to pay its debts?
Which of the following is the golden rule of entry for personal accounts in the accounting process?
According to the Companies Act in a case where the membership of a Producer Company consists of individuals and Producer Institutions, the voting rights...
Which of the following is incorrect with respect to the information that are required to be incorporated in the Memorandum of Association of a Company?
In India, Treasury bills (T-bills) are used to raise short term money for the _____
As per the Companies Act a “company” means_______________
Relevant for Exams:
