Question
Three statements are given, followed by two
conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No Painter are Teacher Some Dentist are Teacher All Lawyers are Dentist Conclusions: I. All Lawyers are Painter II. Some Dentist are not PainterSolution
All Lawyers are Dentist (A) + Some Dentist are Teacher (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Dentist are Teacher (I) + No Teacher are Painter (E) → Some Dentist are not Painter (O). Hence conclusion II follows.
As per section 29 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 _____________ as is the Appellate Tribunal for any person aggrieved by an order or ...
In which case, while fastening the liability on the accused, the Court stated that – “They also serve who only stand and wait”?
Section 244(2) provides that if the accused is charged with one offence, but evidence proves a different offence, the accused—Â
Who is eligible for appointment as a member of a Claims Tribunal under the Motor Vehicles Act?
For refreshing memory a witness may refer a writing_____.
Which Article of the Constitution of India deals with equal justice and free legal aid, inserted as per the 42 nd Amendment under the Directive Principl...
Under Article 21 of the Constitution (Right to Life), the Supreme Court has recognized which of the following as a fundamental right?
The term "relevancy" in the Act is primarily dealt with under which section?Â
Which of the following has been repealed under the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Under the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), 2002, the "Adjudicating Authority" has the power to provisionally attach property for a period not ...
Relevant for Exams:
