Question
Three statements are given followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion logically follow[s] from the statements. Statements: Few Jars are Mugs No Mugs are Jugs All Jars are Container Conclusion: I. Some Jugs are Jars II. No Jugs are ContainerSolution
Few Jars are Mugs (I) + No Mugs are Jugs (E) → Some Jars are not Jugs (O). Hence conclusion I does not follow. All Jars are Container (A) → Conversion → All Container are Jars (A) + Some Jars are not Jugs (O) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
To remove all rows from a table without logging individual row deletions and without firing triggers, which command would you typically use?
What does re.sub(r'(\w+)', r'_\1_', 'hello world') return?
In an E-R diagram, a double rectangle represents a:
Which isolation level allows dirty reads?
Examine the following Java-like code:
```java
class Parent {
String name = "Parent";
p...
A `FOREIGN KEY` constraint is used to:
In paging, the page size is defined by:
Which SQL clause is used to group rows based on one or more columns?
Which aggregate function returns the number of rows that match a specified criterion?
Which of the following is a significant disadvantage of using a traditional file system compared to an RDBMS?
Relevant for Exams:
