Question
In the following question below are given some
statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All Speak is Read. Some Read is Write. No Read is Walk. Conclusions: I. Some Speak is not Walk. II. No Write is Walk. III. Some Speak is Write.Solution
All Speak is Read (A) + No Read is Walk (E) β No Speak is Walk (E) β Conversion β Some Speak is not Walk (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Read is Write (I) β Conversion β Some Write is Read (I) + No Read is Walk (E) β Some Write is not Walk (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Speak is Read (A) + Some Read is Write (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
How is P related to O?
How is N related to G?
How is E is related to B?
Who is the daughter-in-law of R?
If A%C*D&L! F , then how D is related to F?
Which of the following indicates that ‘T is paternal uncle of W’?
Answer the questions based on the information given below.
In a family of three generation, there are eight members M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T. ...
If Champak is the father of Bholu, who is the father of Jelly. Radha is Grandmother of Oggy, who is the son of Jaadu. Mitthu is the paternal uncle of Og...
Which of the following can be the correct conclusion drawn from the expression
‘P % Q + R @ S % T’
In a family of six persons, H is the mother of Iβs mother. F is married to H. N is the maternal uncle of E, who is married to O. I is the son of O. Ho...