Question
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully.
Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All Footballs are Bats. No Hockey is a Bat. All Footballs are Balls. Conclusions: I. Some Bats are Balls. II. No Football is a Hockey.Solution
All Footballs are Bats (A) → Conversion → Some Bats are Footballs (I) + All Footballs are Balls (A) → Some Bats are Balls (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All Footballs are Bats (A) + [No Hockey is a Bat (E) → Conversion] → No Bat is a Hockey (E) → No Football is a Hockey (E). Hence conclusion II follows.
In which case the difference between invitation to offer and offer has been laid down___________________
Art.13 is not applicable to?
The specific performance of a contract may not be obtained by:
In a bailable offence, bail is granted as a matter of right
In the case of Parag Engineering Works vs Union of India and Ors. the Court discussed the meaning and application of ________________-
Who are not competent to Contract as per the Contract Act?
What is the minimum and maximum number of directors required in a public company as per the Companies Act, 2013?
In the context of the establishment of Permanent Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Authorities Act, what is the role of the Central Authority or Stat...
As per the Employee’s Compensation Act, what shall be the amount of compensation where death results from the injury
What are Eligible Companies under section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013?