Question
Statements: Some badminton are sports. No
sports is a player. Conclusions: I. Some badminton are not player. II. Some player are not badminton. In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give Answer:Solution
Alternate: Some badminton are sports (I) + No sports is a player (E) = some badminton are not player (O). Hence, conclusion I will follow. Since, O type propositions cannot be converted, conclusion II will not follow.
If in a certain way ‘Armaan malik’ is related to ‘Neha kakkar’, Kailash kher is related to ‘Lata mangeshkar’ in the same way ‘Arijit’ is...
Which of the following income does Esha have
Who among the following lives in the same numbered floor and flat?
Who among the following persons was born in the month having 31 days?
Which of the following floor and lift does ASHISH use?
What is the position of box X with respect to box S?
Statement:
Only P is QÂ Â Â Â Â Â
Only a few P are R
 Conclusion:   Â
I. All Q are P
II. No R is ...
Who among the following likes Zoology?
Who likes Daisy?
Who among the following lives on the 5th floor?