Question
In the question below there are four statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No languages are communications. All communications are written. 2% written are oral. Only oral are definition. Conclusions: I. No language is oral. II. No written is definition. III. A few communications being oral is a possibility.Solution
No languages are communications (E) + All communications are written (A) โ Some written are not languages (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only oral are definition โ All definition are shelve and definition can have negative relation with anyone. Hence conclusion II follows. All communications are written (A) + 2% written are oral (I) โ Probable conclusion โ Some communications may be oral (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
If the government imposes a binding price floor in a competitive market, what will be the immediate effect on the market price and the quantity traded?
If price charged by the firm is Rs.10 and quantity sold is 15 units. Marginal cost is Rs. 5. What is the Lernerโs Index of Monopoly power?
The problem where one party to a transaction has more or better information than the other, leading to potential market failure, is called:
Find MR when ed=0.5 and P=10
In a perfectly competitive market, a firm’s long run supply curve is
If positive income effect is less than the substitution effect: the product will be
Which of the following is not an instrument of Monetary Policy?
A firm sells 40 units of commodity X when its price is 10. At what price it will sell 60 units of the commodity if its price elasticity of supply is 0....
For the regression line of y on x, 2x+7y+32=0, find the value of byx.
Indiaโs CO2 emissions in last decade?