Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Platforms are Trains. No Train is a Ticket. Some Tickets are Passengers. Conclusions: I. Some Platforms are not Tickets. II. Some Passengers are not Trains. III. Some Passengers are not Platforms.Solution
Some Platforms are Trains (I) + No Train is a Ticket (E) → Some Platforms are not Tickets (O). Hence conclusion I follows. No Train is a Ticket (E) + Some Tickets are Passengers (I) → Some Passengers are not Trains (O*). Hence conclusion II follows. Some Platforms are not Tickets (O) + Some Tickets are Passengers (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which of the following individuals is excluded from the definition of "employee" for the purpose of filing a Voluntary Information Disclosure Form under...
Which of the following is considered as a rule of Fair Hearing under Administrative Law?
As per Section 16(3)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Board shall, ________ of the receipt of a reference from the Adjudicating Autho...
Consider the following statements regarding the attachment and confiscation of property under Sections 5 and 8 of the PMLA, 2002:
Statement 1: ...
As per Section 21 of the Factories Act, 1948, every factory should fence which of the following machineries?
Section 221 provides that for offences under Section 67 BNSS where the parties are married—
Which of the following Union Territory has Local legislature as per Art. 239 A of the Constitution?
The definition of fact is given in which section of the Act?
SSC in the legal field stands for?
Which of the following is not an essential element that a plaintiff must prove in an action for negligence?
Relevant for Exams:
