Question
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully.
Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All Sofa are Flower. No Flower is Wall. Some Wall are Pot. Conclusions: I. Some Sofa are Pot. II. No Flower is Pot III. No Sofa is Wall.Solution
All Sofa are Flower (A) + No Flower is Wall (E) → No Sofa is Wall (E) + Some Wall are Pot (I) → Some Pot are not Sofa (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion III follows. No Flower is Wall (E) + Some Wall are Pot (I) → Some Pot are not Flower (O*). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which famous sorting algorithm uses the divide-and-conquer strategy?
What is the correct syntax to declare a variable in C?
In SQL, which keyword is used to retrieve data from a database?
A firewall that monitors the state of active connections and makes decisions based on the context of those connections is known as a:
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
Which component is responsible for translating virtual addresses to physical addresses?
What is the scope of a variable declared as "static" inside a function?
How can the Banker's algorithm be used to prevent deadlocks?
The java.sql and javax.sql are the primary packages for JDBC 4.0.
In tuple calculus, what does the ∃ symbol represent?
Relevant for Exams:
