Question
A statement is given, followed by two arguments
numbered (I) and (II). Decide which of the given arguments strongly supports the statement.  Statement: Should mercy killing be legalized in India? Argument I: Yes. Mercy killing is already legalized in several other countries.  Argument II: No. Given India’s current social fabric, there is a high probability that the mercy killing provision might end up being misused by some people for their ulterior motives.Solution
The stance of other countries with regards to mercy killing is not necessarily related to what India's stance on the matter should be, since the socio-cultural factors prevailing in those countries might be different from those prevailing in India. Thus, Argument I is a weak argument. Argument II, on the other hand, points out a genuine problem with regards to legalizing mercy killing in the Indian context, therefore, Argument II is a strong argument. Â Hence, the correct answer is (B).
In a leveraged buyout (LBO), what is the primary source of funds used for the acquisition of a company?
Which of the following is/are “inflation measuring indices” in India?
1. Consumer price index
2. Wholesale price index
...
How much loan did Fusion Micro Finance obtain from the United States International Development Finance Corporation (DFC)?
A monthly self-declaration to be filed for furnishing summarized details of all outward supplies made, input tax credit claimed, tax liability ascertai...
A Sub-standard asset is a non performing asset that has remained non-performing for a period __ __________
A manager is expected to solve problems and handle disturbances in the organisation. It is ____ role of a manager.
What is the minimum paid-up share capital to incorporate a Nidhi company?
Which of the following decisions do not affect the Free Cash Flow to equity?
Conscientiousness measures what aspect of a person's personality?
What is the maximum overdraft that can be provided by a bank to account holder of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna ?