Question
A statement is given, followed by two arguments
numbered (I) and (II). Decide which of the given arguments strongly supports the statement.  Statement: Should mercy killing be legalized in India? Argument I: Yes. Mercy killing is already legalized in several other countries.  Argument II: No. Given India’s current social fabric, there is a high probability that the mercy killing provision might end up being misused by some people for their ulterior motives.Solution
The stance of other countries with regards to mercy killing is not necessarily related to what India's stance on the matter should be, since the socio-cultural factors prevailing in those countries might be different from those prevailing in India. Thus, Argument I is a weak argument. Argument II, on the other hand, points out a genuine problem with regards to legalizing mercy killing in the Indian context, therefore, Argument II is a strong argument. Â Hence, the correct answer is (B).
An asset is purchased for Rs. 10,000, on which depreciation is to be provided annually according to the straight-line method. The life of the asset is 4...
When a bank’s assets and liabilities are not aligned in terms of maturity profiles, it primarily exposes the bank to which type of risk?
Which technology is NOT mentioned as part of India’s upgraded Multi-Agency Centre (MAC)?
In the context of filing of financial statements by a company, the term “XBRL” means......................
Capital Structure of a company consists of:
__________ refers to the attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence.
Under which activity would the payment of dividend be classified as, in a cashflow statement?
Calculate the receivables turnover ratio of the company?
Which of the following statement is not true with regards to a bearer plant as per IND AS 16:
Which Schedule of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the general instructions for preparation and presentation of the final accounts of a company?
Relevant for Exams:
