Question
A statement is given, followed by two arguments
numbered (I) and (II). Decide which of the given arguments strongly supports the statement.  Statement: Should mercy killing be legalized in India? Argument I: Yes. Mercy killing is already legalized in several other countries.  Argument II: No. Given India’s current social fabric, there is a high probability that the mercy killing provision might end up being misused by some people for their ulterior motives.Solution
The stance of other countries with regards to mercy killing is not necessarily related to what India's stance on the matter should be, since the socio-cultural factors prevailing in those countries might be different from those prevailing in India. Thus, Argument I is a weak argument. Argument II, on the other hand, points out a genuine problem with regards to legalizing mercy killing in the Indian context, therefore, Argument II is a strong argument. Â Hence, the correct answer is (B).
Eight friends Kriti, Durga, Manasi, Surya, Tahira, Vritti, Ahana and Yoshita are sitting around an square table in such a way that four friends are sitt...
Which of the following pairs represent the people sitting at extreme end of the rows?
Which of the following statement is/are correct?
i) Ranbir and Aishwarya like same Color
ii) Alia sits second to the right of Deepika
Who is the husband of Y?
Who is sitting second to the right of V?
In the question below some statements are given followed by two conclusions I, and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they se...
Mx, Nx, Ox, and Px are sitting around a round table in a conference room. Ez, Fz, Gz, and Hz have also joined the conference. Mx is sitting opposite to ...
Which of the following is R’s position?
If positions of Q and M are interchanged, what will be the position of Q with respect to R?
Six friends P1, G1, C1, D1, A1, and V1 are standing around a hexagon-shaped table. G1 is between V1 and C1. P1 is between A1 and D1. V1 is to the immedi...