Question
have to take the three given statements to be true even
if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: None of the tears are eyes. 1% eyes are hungers. Every hunger is mouth. Conclusions: I. A few hungers are not tears. II. None of the mouths are eyes.Solution
None of the tears are eyes (E) + 1% eyes are hungers (I) → Some hungers are not tears (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. 1% eyes are hungers (I) + Every hunger is mouth (A) → Some eyes are mouth (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Current is measured by:
Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority Act came into effect from ____
Pusa Deepali is a variety of:
The toxin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis interferes with which part of an insect's larvae?
Flowering in sugarcane is called ___________.
Methemoglobinemia disease is caused due to toxic concentration of
Which one of the following is a neutral fertiliser?
How many kinds of genotypes are possible in F2, if four genes are segregating independently?Â
Depression in efficiency of Rhizobium is due to:
The ideal photoperiod requirement for inducing flowering in Gladiolus is: