Question
have to take the three given statements to be true even
if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: None of the tears are eyes. 1% eyes are hungers. Every hunger is mouth. Conclusions: I. A few hungers are not tears. II. None of the mouths are eyes.Solution
None of the tears are eyes (E) + 1% eyes are hungers (I) β Some hungers are not tears (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. 1% eyes are hungers (I) + Every hunger is mouth (A) β Some eyes are mouth (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which of the following is an example of biometric authentication?
What is the name of the batch file that is automatically run when MS-DOS is booted?
Which buffer holds the output for a device?
Which protocol provides encrypted file transfer over SSH for secure communication?
The binary equivalent of (β15)10 is (2βs complement system is used)
Embedded control software used directly within electronic devices is called:
Which SQL clause is used to filter grouped records?
This type of software contains rows and columns.
Which printing technology uses tiny ink droplets propelled onto the paper?
Which version of Java introduced "Project Loom" for improving multithreading?