Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Portraits are Landscapes Some Landscapes are Pixels No Pixels are Resolutions Conclusions: I. Some Landscapes are not Resolutions II. No Portraits are PixelsSolution
Some Landscapes are Pixels (I) + No Pixels are Resolutions (E) → Some Landscapes are Resolutions (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All Portraits are Landscapes (A) + Some Landscapes are Pixels (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follows.
In a commercial contract dispute, the defendant seeks to prove an oral admission made by the plaintiff regarding the terms of the contract. However, the...
Which of the following does NOT qualify as "export" under the SEZ Act?
If the court wants to form an opinion as to any law contained in any Bare act, the opinion shall be relevant? If yes under which section of the Indian E...
Which of the following is a correct reading regarding the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution and its additions?
The Court held that Section 4 of the Specific Relief Act would only be available with regard to civil matters and not to criminal proceedings was held i...
Consider the following statements regarding Section 46 (Lesser Penalty) of the Competition Act, 2002:
Statement 1: A cartel member can apply for ...
“Proceeds of crime” is defined under which provision of PMLA?Â
Every State Information Commissioner shall hold office for _______________ and shall not be eligible for reappointment as such State Information Commis...
Under the Limitation Act, when does the period of limitation begin?Â
The amendment inserting Section 8(2)(c) provides that on reference by Lokpal under proviso to Section 20(1) of Lokpal Act, 2013, persons under clause (d...