Question
Two statements are given followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II, and III assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of conclusion logically follow(s) from the statement. Statements: Some role is designation All delegation is role Conclusions: I. No delegation is designation II. Some role is delegation III. Some delegation being designation is a possibilitySolution
All delegation is role (A) + Some role is designation (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow.
All delegation is role (A) → Conversion → Some role is delegation (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
All delegation is role (A) + Some role is designation (I) → Probable conclusion → Some delegation may be designation (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
A decision taken in response to a problem that has already taken place, is known as _____________
What is a potential drawback of relying solely on intuition when identifying possible solutions?
Which of the following correctly defines decision making?
Which of the following is not a disadvantage of group decision making?
The pre-dispositioning theory of decision making was given by ___________
The Delphi technique of decision making was developed by _________
Which of the following is not a group decision making technique?
Which of the following best describes the normative model of decision making?
SWOT analysis is done by managers to help evaluate various options and make a decision. What does O in SWOT stand for?
What types of a decision is one that is made before the occurrence of an external or internal change?
