Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Urban is Rural. Only Rural is Town. A few Urban is State. Conclusion: I. Few State is not Town. II. All Urban being Rural is a possibility.Solution
Only Rural is Town → All Town are Rural and Town cannot have positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion II does not follow.
Under the BNSS, 2023, who is empowered to issue a proclamation requiring an absconding person to appear?
In which of the following situations would the act amount to "murder" under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, specific performance can be refused by the court when:
Following mediation in a consumer dispute, if the parties reach an agreement on all or some of the issues involved, what is required for the terms of su...
What are the conditions subject to which a company may accept deposits from its members?
Acceptance to be a valid acceptance _______________
Which of the following best describes the new provision in BNSS regarding trials in electronic mode?
When is the risk in goods deemed to have passed from the seller to the buyer in a sale of goods?
______________________ as per the IBC means a person to whom an operational debt is owed and includes any person to whom such debt has been legally assi...
Under which section it is provided that in all civil proceedings the husband or wife of any party to the suit shall be a competent witness?