Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Pots is Lids. No Lid is Mud. Some Muds is Utensils. Conclusions: I. Some Utensils are not Pots. II. Some Pots are not Muds.Solution
All Pots is Lids (A) + No Lid is Mud (E) → No Pot is Mud (E) + Some Muds is Utensils (I) → Some Utensils are not Pots (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. All Pots is Lids (A) + No Lid is Mud (E) → No Pot is Mud (E) → Conversion → Some Pots are not Muds (O). Hence conclusion II follows.
What is the code for “several significant”?
If in a certain code language ‘ you like ’ is coded as ‘ csk kil ’, then which of the following is code of ‘ wisely you always ’?
...What is the code for ‘Beauty’ in the given code language?
The code ‘ q&Q v$S s#X’ stands for
What is the code for ‘dream never have’?
- In a certain code language, ' VALUE' is written as ' WZMFV' and 'FRAUD' is written as ' GSZFE'. How will 'SMILE' be written in that language?
In a certain code language if the word PUZZLE is coded as RXEGWR, then what is coded as OUTPUT?
What is the code of 'president'?
What is the code for ‘future with happiness’?
In a certain code, COMPACT is written as FMPNDAW. How is FERTILE written in that code?