Question
In the following question, two statements are given
each followed by two conclusions I, II & III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements : I. Some letters are paper. II. All papers are objects. III. Some objects are subjects. Conclusion: I. Some papers are not subjects. II. All subjects are objects.Solution
All papers are objects (A) + Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence, conclusion I does not follow. Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some subjects are objects (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Alternative Method: 
Conclusion I: Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Conclusion II:Â Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Â Hence, option (4) is the correct answer.
What is the minimum practice requirement to be eligible for appointment as a Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor under Section 18(7)?
As per the first proviso to Section 4B(1), extension of the Director’s tenure “up to one year at a time” can be granted in public interest:
...When does a conciliation proceeding commences?
As per Section 4A(1), the Director is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of a Committee consisting of:
Communication of the acceptance of an offer is necessary for proceeding towards the formation of a valid contract was held in the case of______
Who are the members of the Board of directors of the Corporation as per the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act?
Under Section 4C(1), the Committee recommending appointment and tenure changes of SP-level and above officers includes, besides the Chairperson:
Preventive relief is granted at the discretion of the court by_____________
Section 3 is titled as:
Once an application for revision is transferred by the High Court to the Sessions Judge:
