📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • ✖

      Question

      In the question below, an argument is given, followed

      by three statements that either strengthen or weaken the given argument. From the options, choose the one that presents the correct relationship each statement bears with the given argument. Note: 'S' stands for a strengthening statement, and 'W' stands for a weakening statement. Argument: Industry analysts observe that many creative agencies deliberately recruit enthusiastic young designers eager to build portfolios in high-profile, "prestige" media fields. However, these new hires frequently find themselves trapped in grueling, undercompensated production roles, because management understands that there is an endless line of applicants desperate to take their place. This environment exposes early-career creatives to rapid exhaustion and career cynicism before they can even establish a stable footing in the market. I. Most prestige media agencies implement highly structured performance review frameworks alongside formal training initiatives designed to accelerate an entry-level designer's advancement into senior, higher-paying roles. II. The vast majority of creative firms structure their entry-level positions with the clear intent of long-term retention, allowing younger workers to gradually adjust to industry pressures. III. Creative studios often build operational models around extracting maximum output from entry-level hires through excessive overtime, operating under the assumption that these workers will inevitably burn out and resign within two years.
      A WSW Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B WWS Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C WWW Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D WSS Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E SWS Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      The Argument: Employers exploit the high demand for "glamour/prestige" roles by overworking and underpaying eager young employees, leading to rapid burnout and cynicism because vacancies are easily filled. Statement I (Weakens - W): The argument claims young workers get trapped and ground down in low-paying roles. Statement I directly counters this by showing that these agencies actively provide formal training, structured reviews, and clear pathways to help entry-level workers move out of those initial roles into senior, higher-paying positions. Statement II (Weakens - W): The argument assumes employers treat young workers as disposable commodities because "vacancies are hotly desired." Statement II undermines this by stating that the operational intent is actually long-term retention and helping them gradually adjust, meaning the jobs are not intentionally designed to grind them down. Statement III (Strengthens - S): This directly supports the core of the argument. It provides explicit evidence that organizations build their actual infrastructure around overworking young employees with the systematic expectation that they are temporary and will inevitably quit due to burnout. Therefore, the correct relationship sequence is Weaken (W), Weaken (W), Strengthen (S), making B the right answer.

      Practice Next
      More Strong and Weak Argument Questions

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question