Question
Each question given below consists of a statement,
followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement: Should the government make it mandatory for all two-wheeler riders to wear helmets at all times while riding? Arguments: I. Yes, this will significantly reduce head injuries and fatalities in case of accidents, improving public safety. II. No, it will impose unnecessary restrictions on individual freedom and choice.Solution
Argument I is strong because it highlights a clear, logical, and socially beneficial reason—improved safety and reduced fatalities—which directly relates to the purpose of the rule. Argument II is weak because while it mentions individual freedom, the argument does not outweigh the concern of public safety, nor does it present a significant reason against the rule beyond personal inconvenience.
Statements:
Some P are Q
All Q are R
Some R are S
Conclusions:
I. Some R are not P
II. All R are P
In the question below there are three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true eve...
What is the shortest distance between S and U?
- In the question below some statements are given followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they ...
Statement:
Some pens are pencils
Only a few pencils are tables
All tables are notebooks
Conclusion:
I. All pens can b...
- Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it app ear s to be at variance ...
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I& II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commo...
In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if t...
In the question below some statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they see...
Statements : All roses are Daisy.
No Lilly is a rose.
No Daisy is a Tulip.
Conclusions : I . Â No Tulip is a Daisy.
<...
