Question
Each question given below consists of a statement,
followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement: Should the government make it mandatory for all two-wheeler riders to wear helmets at all times while riding? Arguments: I. Yes, this will significantly reduce head injuries and fatalities in case of accidents, improving public safety. II. No, it will impose unnecessary restrictions on individual freedom and choice.Solution
Argument I is strong because it highlights a clear, logical, and socially beneficial reason—improved safety and reduced fatalities—which directly relates to the purpose of the rule. Argument II is weak because while it mentions individual freedom, the argument does not outweigh the concern of public safety, nor does it present a significant reason against the rule beyond personal inconvenience.
14Â Â 16Â Â Â 20Â Â Â 15Â Â 25Â Â Â Â 13Â Â Â 29Â Â Â 9Â Â Â 32Â Â Â 6
...125 36 343 ? 729 100
...?     190      210      238      274     318
...133    183    220    ?     263     273
...3 2 10 ? 17 16
...If 10 9 38 x 5428
Then, 2x² + 1 = ?
...53 ? 55 49 57 47
...729 512 343 216 125 ?
...62 123 214 341 ? 727
...A series is 4, 5, 17, 88, 620, 5585
If another series a, b, 23, d, e, f follows the same pattern as the given number series, then find the approx...
