Question
Each question given below consists of a statement,
followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement: Should the government make it mandatory for all two-wheeler riders to wear helmets at all times while riding? Arguments: I. Yes, this will significantly reduce head injuries and fatalities in case of accidents, improving public safety. II. No, it will impose unnecessary restrictions on individual freedom and choice.Solution
Argument I is strong because it highlights a clear, logical, and socially beneficial reason—improved safety and reduced fatalities—which directly relates to the purpose of the rule. Argument II is weak because while it mentions individual freedom, the argument does not outweigh the concern of public safety, nor does it present a significant reason against the rule beyond personal inconvenience.
In weed control, the term “antagonism” refers to which of the following scenarios involving herbicides?
The stump of a recently fallen tree or a detopped herbaceous plant will give visual evidence of:
Which weed is classified as a parasitic weed and is commonly found affecting crops like sugarcane and legumes?
Nozzle is a part of
Marginal physical product (MPP) where P=production, and X=input, is equal to
- Consider the following statement regarding a scheme aims to provide Record of Rights to village household owners. Â 1. The Scheme aims to provide legal ow...
Flag smut of wheat is caused by:
Which control strategy among the following options poses the greatest risk to non-target organisms in the environment?
Dapog method of raising seedlings is related toÂ
Glutathione -S-transferase is responsible for the selectively of
