Question
In the following question, two statements are given
each followed by two conclusions I, II & III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements : I. Some letters are paper. II. All papers are objects. III. Some objects are subjects. Conclusion: I. Some papers are not subjects. II. All subjects are objects.Solution
All papers are objects (A) + Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence, conclusion I does not follow. Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some subjects are objects (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Alternative Method: 
Conclusion I: Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Conclusion II: Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Hence, option (4) is the correct answer.
Which method helps to reduce bias when creating a sample from a population for analysis?
Which of the following scenarios would benefit most from using time series analysis with seasonal decomposition?
Which layer in the OSI model is responsible for end-to-end communication and error-free delivery of data between hosts?
What is a common method to handle missing data in a dataset?
In descriptive statistics, what is the main advantage of using the median over the mean as a measure of central tendency in data analysis?
Which phase of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) focuses on gathering detailed functional and non-functional requirements to define project scop...
Which of the following best illustrates the use of trend analysis in marketing?
Which of the following strategies helps reduce sampling bias?
A data analyst is tasked with understanding customer churn for a subscription-based business. Which of the following steps should they prioritize immedi...
In time series forecasting, what is the primary role of the ARIMA model ?
