Statement : The Municipal Corporation of a major city recently released a public notice stating: "To combat severe water logging during the upcoming monsoon season, all storm water drains in the central business district will undergo deep dredging and desilting over the next two weeks." Which of the following is an assumption implicit in the given statement?

Validity of Option B: When the Municipal Corporation explicitly sets a deadline of "over the next two weeks" to complete the deep dredging and desilting, they implicitly assume that it is feasible to complete the task within this specified timeframe. If they assumed it was impossible to finish in two weeks, setting that timeline in a public notice would be illogical. Why Option A is incorrect: The statement does not assume that blocked drains are the sole cause of water logging (extreme words like "solely" make an assumption invalid). The authority only assumes that desilting will help combat or reduce the problem, not that no other factors exist. Why Option C is incorrect: The notice specifies work in the "central business district", not the "entire city". Assuming complete elimination city-wide far exceeds the scope of the statement. Why Option D is incorrect: This is a negative assumption that contradicts the intent of taking a public action. Authorities plan public works assuming feasibility and standard cooperation, not non-cooperation. Why Option E is incorrect: This focuses on past failure or blame, which is not an underlying assumption required to undertake the current action.