Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Now for sitting arrangement – Only one member sits between O’s sister and M’s brother. Only two members sit between O’s father and U’s father. U’s husband, who likes Dehradun, sits third to the right of U’s uncle. R sits second to the left of U’s husband. The member who sits just opposite to U’s brother, who likes Mumbai, sits immediate left of M’s daughter. R’s grandfather, who likes Delhi, is not an immediate neighbour of N. U likes Nainital and Q likes Punjab. From these conditions there will be two cases: Case 1:- Now Neither N nor U’s grandfather sits just opposite to U. As there will be no place left for U in case 2. So case 2 will be eliminated. From rest U likes Nainital and Q like PUNJAB. O likes neither Pune nor Bangalore. T likes Lucknow. P does not like Bangalore. So the final solution is –
Plaint shall state precisely the amount claimed in all money suits except amount for________.
_________ is the conclusive evidence in case of company that statutory requirements have complied with
If a partner earns some profit for himself from the business of the firm?
Quid Pro Quo means_____________________
Which of the following Union Territory has Local legislature as per Art. 239 A of the Constitution?
Which section of SARFAESI Act deals with measures of Asset Reconstruction?
Confidential communication between legal advisor and clients is covered under which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
What actions can the appropriate Government take when fixing or revising minimum rates of wages under the Code on Wages?
Which of the following sections of the Act, waives the proof of judicial admissions_____.
A president’s rule can be proclaimed by?