Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Now for sitting arrangement – Only one member sits between O’s sister and M’s brother. Only two members sit between O’s father and U’s father. U’s husband, who likes Dehradun, sits third to the right of U’s uncle. R sits second to the left of U’s husband. The member who sits just opposite to U’s brother, who likes Mumbai, sits immediate left of M’s daughter. R’s grandfather, who likes Delhi, is not an immediate neighbour of N. U likes Nainital and Q likes Punjab. From these conditions there will be two cases: Case 1:- Now Neither N nor U’s grandfather sits just opposite to U. As there will be no place left for U in case 2. So case 2 will be eliminated. From rest U likes Nainital and Q like PUNJAB. O likes neither Pune nor Bangalore. T likes Lucknow. P does not like Bangalore. So the final solution is –
The protection of Article 300-A "persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law" is available to:
Statements made by persons to whom a party to the suit has expressly referred for information in reference to a matter in dispute are
Right to equality is provided under Article/s of the Constitution?
Where neither party makes any appropriation, how shall the payment be applied in discharge of the debts?
Asper the Insurance Act, 1938 when can the termination of the appointment of the Administrator be made by the Authority?
An accused person may be a competent witness in his own defence under the code of Criminal Procedure 1973:
If the parties fail to determine the number of arbitrators,
Under which circumstances does a contract require prior approval from the Central Government in India as per section 12 of the Airport Authority of Indi...
Break down theory of divorce is reflected in:
What is dacoity?