Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
We have: The one, who visits Dehradun, visits on any day after Friday, that means we have two possible day for the one who visits Dehradun, in case (1) the one who visits Dehradun, visits on Saturday, in case (2) the one who visits Dehradun, visits on Sunday. There were two days gap between the one, who have Tissot and Shiv who visits Dehradun. Aman visits Aligarh on Tuesday. There were two days gap between Aman and the one who has Timex. The one, who visits Punjab, visits on adjacent day of the one who has Timex, that means we have three possible day for the one who visits Punjab, in case (1) & case (2a) the one who visits Punjab visits on Thursday, in case (2b) the one who visits Punjab visits on Saturday. Based on above given information we have: Again, we have: Radhey neither visits on adjacent day of the one has Tissot nor on adjacent day of Shiv. One person visits between the one who visits Mumbai and Radhey, who has Rolex, that means Radhey visits on Monday. There were three days gap between the one who has Titan and the one who visits Mumbai. Bharat neither has Titan nor he visits before the one who visits Punjab and he visits Meerut. There were two days gap between Bharat and the one who likes Omega, who visits on adjacent day of the one who has Tissot, that means case (2b) is not valid, in case (1) Bharat visits on Friday, in case (2a) Bharat visits on Saturday. Based on above given information we have:
Case (2b) is not valid as Bharat doesn’t visit before the one who visits Punjab. Again, we have: The one who has CASIO and Salman visits on adjacent days. There were three days gap between Salman and the one who visits Kanpur, that means in case (1) Salman visits on Wednesday, in case (2) Salman visits on Friday. Neither Salman nor Raghav visits Kanpur, that means in case (1) Raghav visits Punjab. At least three person visits between the one, who visits Jaipur and the one, who has Citizen, that means case (2a) is not valid. Based on above given information we have final arrangement we have:
Case (2a) is not valid as At least three person visits between the one, who visits Jaipur and the one, who has Citizen.
The sum of three numbers is 184. If the ratio of the first to the second is 3:4 and that of second to the third is 8:9 then the second number is?
Abdul allocates 90% of his income among his wife, son, and daughter in the ratio of 5:2:1, while saving the remaining amount, which totals Rs. 4,000. Fr...
The ratio of the pocket money of two persons ‘R’ and ‘S’ is 6:5, respectively. ‘R’ spends 60% of his pocket money while ‘S’ spends 70% o...
646 number of chocolates divided among A, B and C in the ratio 1/2: 2 : 1/3 respectively. How many more chocolates did A receive as compared to that rec...
A sum of money is divided among P, Q, R and S in the ratio of 3:4:8:9 respectively. If the share of R's is Rs. 2600 more than the share of Q, then what ...
The cost of diamond varies directly as the square of its weight. A diamond broke into four pieces with weights in the ratio 1 : 3 : 4 : 6. if the loss i...
If a:b = 3:2, then find the value of (2a + 3b):(5b - 2a).
What must be added to each term of the ratio 3:7 so that it may equal to 4:5?
6 years ago ratio of the ages of the two persons A and B was 5:2. 4 years hence the ratio of their ages will be 7:4. Find the present age of B.