Question
Three statements are followed by four conclusions
numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements Statements: 1. All peacocks are ducks 2. No ducks is a kite 3. All fowls are kites Conclusions: I. Some fowls are peacocks II. No kite is a peacock III. No peacock is a fowl IV. Some kites are peacocks ÂSolution
The correct answer is B
Protection from Ex post facto laws is covered under which Article of the Constitution?
The committee of creditors, may, in the first meeting, ________________________, either resolve to appoint the interim resolution professional as a reso...
According to IPC Right to private defence commences when______ and continues till________
Under which one of the following sections of CrPC., Magistrate second class can conduct summary trial?Â
According to Indian Partnership Act, 1932 what entitlement does an outgoing partner or their estate have if the surviving partners continue the busines...
According to the Consumer Protection Act which body among the following has the power to appoint an expert for assistance?
District Commission:
“Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights” is which Article of the Constitution?
Under Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, a negotiable instrument may be negotiated
Which section of the Bharatiya Sakshaya Adhiniyam, 2023 delas with the provisions related to confession to the police?
Relevant for Exams:
