Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament has many flaws. Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
Solution: This is definitely true because of the facts mentioned in the passage.
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
There are eight persons G, H, I, J, K, L, M and N in a family of three gen...
How is I’s mother related to J?
Answer the questions based on the information given below.
There are seven persons- D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, in a family, which consist of th...
Which of the following combinations of person is not a married couple?
How is D related to G?
If,
‘T + S’ means that T is the father of S,
‘T X S’ means that T is the mother of S,
‘T - S’ means ‘T’ is the wif...
Answer the following question based on the information given below:
There are seven members- D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, in a family of three gene...
Who is the mother of D, in the given arrangement?
Answer the questions based on the information given below.
Six persons M, N, O, P, Q and R live in a family of three generations. M is married ...
Z is the brother of Y, W is the wife of V, who is the only son of P, who is the male member of the family. Y is the daughter of W. How is P related to Z?