Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament has many flaws. Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
Solution: This is definitely true because of the facts mentioned in the passage.
Which of the following is correct about altering the boundaries of any State?
Which of the following taxes is considered indirect?
A suit for possession of an immovable property, under section 6 of Specific Relief Act can be filed within__________ of dispossession
In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must:
When the right of private defense of property extends to causing death:
Section 21 of the specific relief Act is related to:
Every chairman of the Board of directors who is appointed on a whole-time basis and every managing director of a banking company shall be in the whole -...
According to SEBI(DP) Regulations, 2018 the voting on a resolution in the meeting of the governing board shall be valid only
The Advocate-General for the State is appointed by __________________
Any person aggrieved by an order ¬¬¬_________________ may prefer an appeal to a Securities Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter.
...