Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament will help in reducing the instances of child labour Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
Solution: We can’t infer if the law will definitely lead to reducing child labour.
To find the Next number in the given series.
342 510 726 996 1326 ?
...Find the value of c.
-3Â Â Â Â Â -2Â Â Â Â -12Â Â Â Â -9Â Â Â Â -100Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -375
 31    a     �...
3601 3602 1803 604 154 36
...Identify the logic of the below given series and given answer.
Series I :: 81, 89, 116, 241, (A), 1915
Series II :: (B), 204, 208, 4...
9999 6666 ? 2962.66 1975.11 1316. 74
...20Â Â Â 60Â Â Â Â 150Â Â Â Â 300Â Â Â 450Â Â Â ?
60000 2400 120 8 0.8 ?
...32, 65 , 196, 785, ? , 23557
12 11 18 34 89.5 259.5
...Find the maximum number of trees which can be planted, 25 meters apart, on the two sides of a straight road 2125 meters long