Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament will help in reducing the instances of child labour Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
Solution: We can’t infer if the law will definitely lead to reducing child labour.
- A person purchased 240 books at Rs.75 each and marked 40% of these up by 40% and remaining by 60%. The books that are marked up by 40% are sold after allow...
- A shopkeeper gives a 25% discount on the marked price of an item. In this transaction, he earns a profit of 50%. If the profit earned by the shopkeeper is ...
Article ‘P’, if sold at a profit of 20% earns a profit of Rs. 500. If article ‘P’ is marked 40% above its cost price and then sold after offerin...
Selling price of article ‘A’ when sold at a profit of 50% is Rs. 180 more than its selling price when sold at a loss of 40%. If the cost price of ar...
A shopkeeper sold a school bag at a profit of 65%. Had he sold the school bag at 35% profit he would have earned Rs.183 less. Find the cost price of the...
A shopkeeper sold an article after offering two successive discounts of 17% and 15%, respectively. The marked price of the article is Rs. 1200. If the c...
Pine Tree Publications sold a Textbook for Rs. 120 and made a profit of 25% on its CP and sold an Encyclopedia for Rs. 720 and made a profit of 15% on i...
A television costs ₹35,000 less than a printer. If the cost of the printer is twice the cost of the television, then the cost of the television is:
A person sold a house at 15% Profit. If he had purchased it for 25% less and sold it for Rs 48 less, then there would have been a profit of 32%. Find th...
Shyam marked an article 25% above cost price and sold it for Rs. 1080 after allowing a discount of 10%. Find his profit (in Rs.).