Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament is a welcome move as it imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
The inference is 'probably false' in the light of the facts given. While it is true that the Act imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work, the passage highlights several flaws in the Act that make it less effective in addressing child labor in India. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Act is a welcome move based on this single provision alone.
Recently the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD has released the Global Trade Update 2024, when was UNCTAD established?
What is the full form of BRO?
Which of the following is NOT a conductor?
The length of the men's kabaddi court is _____ metres.
What is the source of Directive Principles of State Policy?
Which of the following is NOT a correct match?
Who among the following has been appointed the Chairman of 6th Finance Commission in Rajasthan?
How many Grand Slam titles has Australian tennis player Ashleigh Barty won so far?
Which of the following operators connects a structure variable and its element?
In June 2020, the President of India promulgated the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020. Which of the following is the main feature of this...