Question
In which of the following case it was held that if a
company pursues objects beyond the scope of the memorandum of association, the company's actions are ultra vires and void?Solution
Facts: Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd’s memorandum stated that its objects were "to make and sell, or lend on hire, railway-carriages…" and that the activities beyond this needed a special resolution. But the company agreed to give Riche and his brother a loan to build a railway in Belgium. Later, the company repudiated the agreement. Riche sued, and the company pleaded that the action was ultra vires.
Statements: B > C= D > F < G = J; H > F > I ≥ E
Conclusions:
I. C > E
II. H < G
III. J = H
Statements: C > D = E ≥ G; F = G ≥ J < O
Conclusions:
I. D ≥ J
II. J < D
Statements: P > Q = R ≤ S; R > T > U; U = Z ≥ O
Conclusions:
I. P > U
II. O < S
III. R > P
- Statements: N ≤ O < P; N ≥ Q < R; Q > S ≥ T
Conclusions:
I. Q ≤ O
II. R ≥ T
III. Q > P In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, Find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and t...
Statements: B < C ≥ D; T < G ≥ E; E < C
Conclusions:
I. T < C
II. C > G
III. E < D
Statement:X=Y ≥ Z > Q; Y < V ; W < Q
Conclusions:
I. V > W
II. Q > V
In the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. Read the...
Statements: A > B; C > D; E ≥ A; F = C; C < B
Conclusions:
(i) B > D
(ii) A > F
(iii) F < E
...Statements: I $ N, N # U, U @ E, E & S
Conclusions: I. E & N II. S @ N III. I $ U
...
Relevant for Exams:
