Question
The CEO has assured (A) that the company would not have
been (B) laying off any employees until the financial situation (C) did not improved. (D) In the following question , a sentence is divided into four parts A, B, C, and D in which two of the parts have some grammatical or contextual errors in them. You have to identify which pair among the given alternatives represents the parts that contain those errors. If none of the part ha s any error, then, mark option E , i.e., ‘No error’ as your answer.Solution
B: "Would not have been" is incorrect. It should be "would not be," as the sentence is talking about a future action (laying off employees).D: "Did not improved" is incorrect. The correct form is "did not improve" because the verb "improve" should be in its base form when following "did not."Thus, the errors are in parts B and D, making the correct answer (b) B & D.
Which of the following four-firm concentration ratios is most consistent with monopolistic competition?
Park Test is used for which of the following?
Guess an even integer between 1 and 100 that is closest to 1/2 of the mean of the guesses, what will be the equilibrium in that case?
What do you mean by ‘under conditions of a perfect competition in the product market’?
In which year FRBM Act was enacted ?
Any straight-line supply curve that has a positive horizontal intercept has an elasticity of supply
While calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, the following values are obtained for 25 pairs of observations. It was later discovered that two pa...
In case of Multicollinearity, if the Ri2(Coefficient of auxiliary regression on independent variables) is 0.80 and the variance of the OLS es...
In the IS-LM model, what happens if the demand for money (money holding) increases, all else being equal?
Consider the following:
Assertion (A): According to Peacock-Wiseman hypothesis, public expenditure increases overtime in a step-by-step manner.