📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    Question

    In the following questions, some part of the sentence

    is underlined. Which of the options given below the sentence should replace the part underlined to make the sentence grammatically & contextually correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given then choose option E ‘No Correction required’ as the answer. If a company is burdened with costly debt, it will arguably be more prudent than reduce or eliminate those interest expenses and work towards becoming debt-free.
    A it would arguably be more prudent to Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B it won’t arguably be more prudent to Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C it would argue to be more prudent than Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D it will argue be more prudent to Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E No Correction required Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    "It would arguably be more prudent to" is the most grammatically and contextually correct option.  The sentence suggests that if a company is burdened with costly debt, it would be a wise decision to reduce or eliminate those interest expenses.  The conditional "would" is appropriate here because it aligns with the hypothetical situation (being burdened with debt) and suggests that this is the prudent course of action.

    Practice Next
    More Rearrangement Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question