Question
Statement: Some dogs are cats. No lion
is a dog. Conclusions: I. Some cats are lions. II. Some cats are not lions. In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.Solution
No lion is a dog (E) + Some dogs are cats (I) ⇒ Some cats are not lions (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion II follows.
Which famous sorting algorithm uses the divide-and-conquer strategy?
What is the correct syntax to declare a variable in C?
In SQL, which keyword is used to retrieve data from a database?
A firewall that monitors the state of active connections and makes decisions based on the context of those connections is known as a:
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
Which component is responsible for translating virtual addresses to physical addresses?
What is the scope of a variable declared as "static" inside a function?
How can the Banker's algorithm be used to prevent deadlocks?
The java.sql and javax.sql are the primary packages for JDBC 4.0.
In tuple calculus, what does the ∃ symbol represent?
Relevant for Exams:
