📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    Question

    In the question below there are three statements

    followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No Light is Street. All Umbrella is Road. No Road is Street. Conclusions: I. No Umbrella is Street. II. Some Light not being Umbrella is a possibility.
    A Only conclusion I follows Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Neither conclusion I nor II follows Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Only conclusion II follows Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Both conclusions I and II follow Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E None of the above Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    All Umbrella is Road (A) + No Road is Street (E) → No Umbrella is Street (E). Hence conclusion I follows. No Light is Street (E) + No Street is Umbrella (E) → Probable conclusion → Some Light may not be Umbrella (O). Hence conclusion II follows.

    Practice Next
    More Syllogism Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question