Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 10% destinations are travel Only a few travel are distance Only a few distance are time No time is speed Conclusions: I. All time are travel II. All distance being time is a possibility III. No speed is destinationsSolution
Only a few travel are distance (I) + Only a few distance are time (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few distance are time → All time may be distance (A).  Hence conclusion II does not follow. 10% destinations are travel (I) + Only a few travel are distance (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
In a futures contract, marking-to-market refers to:
If coefficient of correlation rxy= 1, then
In the context of "swarm-like clusters" (Swarm Intelligence), which of the following best describes the mechanism that allows the group to exhibit compl...
In the foreign exchange market price of US Dollar rises from ₹ 60 to ₹ 61. This means that_____
Which of the following is not true with regard to credit rating agency?
T he Golden Rule of Capital in the Solow Growth Model is that level of steady-state capital per worker where,
             I.  �...
If the correlation between x and y is 0.6 covariance is 27, variance of y is 25, then what is the variance of x?
Consider the following:
Assertion (A): According to Peacock-Wiseman hypothesis, public expenditure increases overtime in a step-by-step manner.
The "Tragedy of the Commons" is most directly associated with the problem of providing:
If a random variable X follows a uniform distribution between 0 and 1, what is the expected value of X?