Question
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully.
Assuming the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some Patient are Doctor. Some Doctor are Lawyer. No Teacher is a Lawyer. All Judge are Teacher. Conclusion: I. No Judge is Lawyer. II. Some Patient are Lawyer. III. Some Doctor are not Judge.Solution
All Judge are Teacher (A) + No Teacher is a Lawyer (E) → No Judge is a Lawyer (E). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Patient are Doctor (I) + Some Doctor are Lawyer (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Judge are Teacher (A) + No Teacher is a Lawyer (E) → No Judge is a Lawyer (E) + [Some Doctor are Lawyer (I) → Conversion] → Some Lawyer are Doctor (I) → Some Doctor are not Judge. (O*). Hence conclusion III follows.
What is the primary advantage of using the ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) model for forecasting time series data?
Which of the following Big Data processing models is based on the concept of continuous data flow processing?Â
Which of the following features in Power BI allows for dynamically filtering data across multiple visuals with a single control element?
A smart home system is compromised, and attackers remotely control connected devices like security cameras and smart locks. Which security principle is ...
Which traversal method is most suitable for finding connected components in an undirected graph?
Which of the following best highlights how data analysts contribute to achieving organizational goals?
What is the difference between a list and a tuple in Python?
A data analyst has generated insights on customer retention trends. To effectively communicate these insights, which of the following techniques would b...
What is a key distinction between metadata and primary data in a database context?
Which Python library is primarily used for data manipulation and cleaning?
Relevant for Exams:
