Question
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully.
Assuming the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some Patient are Doctor. Some Doctor are Lawyer. No Teacher is a Lawyer. All Judge are Teacher. Conclusion: I. No Judge is Lawyer. II. Some Patient are Lawyer. III. Some Doctor are not Judge.Solution
All Judge are Teacher (A) + No Teacher is a Lawyer (E) → No Judge is a Lawyer (E). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Patient are Doctor (I) + Some Doctor are Lawyer (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Judge are Teacher (A) + No Teacher is a Lawyer (E) → No Judge is a Lawyer (E) + [Some Doctor are Lawyer (I) → Conversion] → Some Lawyer are Doctor (I) → Some Doctor are not Judge. (O*). Hence conclusion III follows.
Which section of the IRDA Act deals with the provisions relating to the constitution of the IRDA Fund?
Which section of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque is not invalid by reason that it is ...
Under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed compensation for death in a "hit and run" motor accident case? (as per 2022 amendment rules)
According to Code 35 (1) of the Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions Code, 2020, what can an Inspector-cum-Facilitator do regarding crop...
As per the of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, what is the rate of interest that a sum directed to be paid by an arbitral award shall carry, un...
If parties adopt fast track procedure for arbitration which of the following is skipped-
Which one of the following is not an essential condition for application of Rule of "Lis Pendens" under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act? <...
The term fund has been defined under which section of the IRDA Act?
Words are divided into parts of speech according to:
What is the objective of Payment and Settlements Act?