Question
Statements: Only CEO are BOD. Only a few
CEO are CGM. No CEO is MD. A few MD are GM. Conclusions: I. At least Some CEO are not CGM. II. Some BOD being GM is a possibility. III. Some GM being CEO is a possibility. IV. Some MD can be BOD. In the question below some statements are given followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Only a few CEO are CGM → Some CEO are not CGM (O) and Some CEO are CGM (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Only CEO are BOD → Some BOD are CEO and BOD cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence neither conclusion II not IV follow. No CEO is MD (E) + A few MD are GM (I) → Some GM are not CEO (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some CEO may be GM (A).  Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which operation in relational algebra is used to create a new relation that includes all the rows from two given relations?
Which cryptographic process involves applying a mathematical function to generate a fixed-size output from variable-size input?
What is the purpose of the "HAVING" clause in an SQL query?
 Which of following is /are for strict evaluation?
What does below UNIX command do?
cp file1 file2
Autovalue is a property of
State true or false
Pipelining is a technique used in computer architecture to enhance instruction-level parallelism and improve the efficiency o...
What is the primary responsibility of the "Controller" in the MVC architecture?
 FAT stands for?
The sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes in a binomial distribution is equal to:
Relevant for Exams:
