Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Cycles are Trains. Only Trains are Car. Some Trains are not Bike. Conclusion: I. Some Car are Cycles II. Some Bike can be Cycles.Solution
Only Trains are Car → All Car are Trains and Car cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Cycles are Trains (I) + Some Trains are not Bike (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Bike can be Cycles (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
The pungency of chilli is due to
Kinnow is a cross between
Tembotrione has been registered in India for its use in
Yerruseri is a value added product of which crop?
Which symptom is associated with the Spiny Bollworm (Earias insulana) during the pre-flowering stage?
Match the short cuts in the left column with the functions listed in the right column, w.r.t. Microsoft Word.
a) Ctrl+X           �...
There is a mutual antagonistic effect on the uptake of K, Ca & Mg. What is the ideal ratio of K, Ca & Mg for Groundnut?
Regarding organic farming in India, consider the following statements:
A. The National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) is operated under ...
Which act in India governs Plant Quarantine measures to prevent the introduction of pests harmful to crops?
The practice of growing more than one crop on the same field at the same time in a definite row pattern, called………………
...