Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Cycles are Trains. Only Trains are Car. Some Trains are not Bike. Conclusion: I. Some Car are Cycles II. Some Bike can be Cycles.Solution
Only Trains are Car → All Car are Trains and Car cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Cycles are Trains (I) + Some Trains are not Bike (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Bike can be Cycles (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
An agreement consists of reciprocal promises between at least
Under Specific Relief Act the Question of Title is___________
Which section of the Information Technology Act, 2000 lays down provision related to validity of contracts formed through electronic means?
What is the punishment for repeat offenders under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for offences committed against women and children?
The fundamental rights of the Indian Constitution are:
The State Government, after consultation with the concerned High Court, shall specify a pecuniary value ________________ for Commercial Courts as per Co...
According to the law, admissions____________
Under the BSA, who has the burden of proof in a civil suit?
There is a school by the side of the road. Three children of nursery class stray away from the school on to the road. A truck driver, who was driving t...
Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, who among the following is not a consumer?
Relevant for Exams:
