Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Cycles are Trains. Only Trains are Car. Some Trains are not Bike. Conclusion: I. Some Car are Cycles II. Some Bike can be Cycles.Solution
Only Trains are Car → All Car are Trains and Car cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Cycles are Trains (I) + Some Trains are not Bike (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Bike can be Cycles (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
EPFO is under the administrative control of which Ministry?
 In a coded language 'PROBLEM' is written as 'MPERLOB'. In the same coded language how will you write 'NUMBERS' ?Â
Match List-1 (Distinguished Women) with List-II (Known As/Area) and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists:
Assertion (A): Opportunity cost is always equal to the monetary cost of a commodity.
Reason (R): Opportunity cost refers to the next best alterna...
Which of the following is not a binary number?Â
30 men can complete a piece of work in 48 days. ‘x’ men started the work and after 33 days 64 more men joined them so that whole work was finished i...
Which of the following is a popular web browser used for accessing the internet?
If '384 C 5 = 96’ and 540 C 6 = 90, then 468 C 9 = ?
The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) is a high-level advisory body established in ________________ .