Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Cycles are Trains. Only Trains are Car. Some Trains are not Bike. Conclusion: I. Some Car are Cycles II. Some Bike can be Cycles.Solution
Only Trains are Car β All Car are Trains and Car cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Cycles are Trains (I) + Some Trains are not Bike (O) β Probable conclusion β Some Bike can be Cycles (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
Which parameter describes the soluble salts content in irrigation water and is measured in ds/m?
Urea fertilizer is the main source of nitrogen,applied in oir fields ,The NPK ratio of urea is:
How many members are present in the WTO?
The book Nature and Properties of Soils is written by
Which of the following is NOT correctly matched?
Which of the following occurs during meiosis but not during mitosis?
Subsidy for green house is given under ___
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R.Β
Assertion A: Rejuvenation is an effectiv...
To raise incomes for farmers with enhanced production & productivity, Urea Gold was introduced. Urea Gold address which of the following challenges give...
The land-related reform enacted to protect tenants from eviction and secure their right to cultivate the land is known as: