Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Cycles are Trains. Only Trains are Car. Some Trains are not Bike. Conclusion: I. Some Car are Cycles II. Some Bike can be Cycles.Solution
Only Trains are Car → All Car are Trains and Car cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Cycles are Trains (I) + Some Trains are not Bike (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Bike can be Cycles (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
The NIC is a fundamental tool used in statistical surveys, censuses, economic research, and policy formulation. What does the letter ‘I’ in NIC stan...
Which organization has announced plans to develop an integrated network of around 10,000 kilometers of optic fiber cables (OFC) infrastructure across In...
When a shuttle is hit high up into the air, the player has time to play a powerful overhead shot directly to the opponent’s court floor. This is known...
Who released Food Security Index?
 ___________ type of bond guarantees a form of insurance protection that covers policyholders for losses that they incur as a result of fraudulent acts...
The EASE reforms are intended for which of the following institutions?
The Rajasthan Government launched the 512 new Indira Rasoi from which place, in September 2022?
The pattern of assistance payable under the micro irrigation scheme will be 55% for small and marginal farmers and 45% for other farmers which will be m...
Which of the following countries is the largest producer of milk?
Magnolia and Laurel trees are found in which type of forest in India?