Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Parrots are Sparrows Some Trees are Parrots No Sparrow is Bird. Conclusions: I. No Parrot is Bird. II. Some Trees are not Birds. III. Some Sparrows are Trees.Solution
All Parrots are Sparrows (A) + No Sparrow is Bird (E) → No Parrot is Bird (E). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Trees are Parrots (I) + No Parrot is Bird (E) → Some Trees are not Birds (O). Hence conclusion II follows. Some Trees are Parrots (I) + All Parrots are Sparrows (A) → Some Trees are Sparrows (I) → Conversion → Some Sparrows are Trees (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
An LLP shall receive notices and official documents at:
Which of the following cannot be patented under the Patents Act, 1970?
The Information Technology Act, 2000 did not amend the provisions of which Act?
Which provision of the Court Fees Act, 1870 prescribe mode of levy of court fee in the case of multifarious suits?
What is the maximum period for which security for good behaviour from habitual offenders can be demanded by a magistrate?
Principles of Natural Justice are:
In the case of Puttuswamy vs UOI, right to privacy was interpreted to be a Fundamental right guaranteed under Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. Ho...
Who can the High Court appoint to exercise jurisdiction in a Court of Session?
The thief in order to steal something, creeps after sunset into a ship at a port- hole between decks and then leaves before sunrise.He has committed
According to section 456 of the Companies Act, 2013 no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the ____________ of action taken in...
