Question
A statement is given, followed by few conclusions. You
must assume everything in the statement to be true, and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which conclusion(s) is/are true. Statement: A few businessmen and all the politicians involved in the 2G scam were arrested last week. Vijay and Arjun were among those arrested. Â Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I. Vijay and Arjun are politicians II. Vijay and Arjun are businessmen III. Vijay and Arjun are involved in the 2G scam IV. Vijay and Arjun are either politicians or businessmen.Solution
If Vijay and Arjun were arrested, they are definitely either politicians or businessmen (but we do not know which). Hence, conclusions I and II cannot be inferred and conclusion IV can be inferred. Conclusion III obviously has to be correct because only those were arrested who were involved in the 2G scam. So both III and IV can be inferred. Â Hence, the correct answer is (D).
Subsistence allowance has to be paid by decree holder, if not paid_____
The RTI Act is applicable to which of the following ___________
In which one among the following cases the Supreme Court of India said that 'it is not an absolute rule of law that dying declaration must be corroborat...
The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless_______________
A male Indian citizen (Hindu) with a wife and three children in India travels to the United States for advanced education. While in the US, he enters in...
In which of the following cases, notice of dishonour is unnecessary?
                             I.      ...
Which of the following categories of persons is NOT entitled to free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987?Â
Special Courts will follow the procedure as mentioned under
Which of the following words were inserted in the Preamble by Constitution 42nd Amendment Act?
 Z endeavours to strike A with a horsewhip, not in a way that would cause severe harm to A. In response, A retrieves a pistol. Despite this, Z contin...