📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • ✖

      Question

      More than 50 accredited social health activists have

      requested Municipality to offer them ID cards. Statement I: The social health activists work on a voluntary and ad hoc basis and hence providing them with ID cards is not a feasible option. Statement II: When the social health activists visit houses for immunization they are rudely questioned by the residents and having an ID card will provide them credibility. In making decisions about important questions it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments so far as they relate to the questions. ‘Strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly affect and relate to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and may also not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Instructions:  Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument. Give answer;
      A If only argument I is strong Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B If only argument II is strong Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C If either I or II is strong Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D If neither I nor II is strong; and Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E If both I and II are strong Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      For people to believe in the social health activists, ID cards ae important as they will provide credibility. 

      Practice Next
      More Statement and assumption Questions

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question