Imposing a ban on fire crackers is not the ONLY way to ensure a control in pollution levels as it is also mentioned in the statement that this has been done as a test to check if the pollution levels fall. Thus I is not implicit. Nothing about development or other states following the trend is relevant to the ban on sale of fire crackers. Hence, II is not implicit. Assumption III tells whether it will be easy or difficult to impose a ban on the crackers and the fact that stocks have already been produced. It is not something that the reader will assume on the basis of the given statement thus. III is not implicit. Since the ban is temporary, there are chances of its upliftment. Hence IV is implicit.
Statements:
I) Under Mukhbir Yojana, the government will provide an incentive of up to Rs 2 lakh to anyone who would alert the state authoriti...
Statement: The rail security helpline was flooded with complaints on catering and cleanliness in the trains.
I. Railways has initiated a ne...
Event (A): The announcements filed by listed companies will be disseminated directly on the NSE website without the exchange's intervention.
Event (A): The announcements filed by listed companies will be disseminated directly on the NSE website without the exchange's intervention.
...
How many people younger than B?
Event (A): Researchers at Bengaluru based Transdisciplinary University (TDU) have found that when water, inoculated wi...
Event (A): More than 70 students went on a hunger strike for three days when they were barred from writing exams due to attendance shortage.
E...
Event (A): The authorities of Lumbini Gardens have blatantly encroached upon the footpath on 4th Main, Coffee Board Layout in Nagavara.
Event...
What is the sum of ages of F, T and C?
Event (A): The announcements filed by listed companies will be disseminated directly on the NSE website without the exchange's intervention.
...