Imposing a ban on fire crackers is not the ONLY way to ensure a control in pollution levels as it is also mentioned in the statement that this has been done as a test to check if the pollution levels fall. Thus I is not implicit. Nothing about development or other states following the trend is relevant to the ban on sale of fire crackers. Hence, II is not implicit. Assumption III tells whether it will be easy or difficult to impose a ban on the crackers and the fact that stocks have already been produced. It is not something that the reader will assume on the basis of the given statement thus. III is not implicit. Since the ban is temporary, there are chances of its upliftment. Hence IV is implicit.
India’s rank in the 2024 Rule of Law Index by the World Justice Project is:
Consider the following statements:
1. ISRO's Aditya-L1 mission completed its first halo orbit around the Sun-Earth L1 point.
2. The Aditya...
What is the primary purpose of the Health ID under the ABDM?
What is the primary source of methane emissions, which contributed to its record growth in 2023?
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the RBI's policy stance and recent economic predictions?
1. State Bank of India's e...
In Assam, the longest flyover of the state was inaugurated, what is its length?
Which technology company has tied up with SBI to ease payments for Indian students studying abroad?
What is the main objective of celebrating Statistics Day on June 29 in India?
Dunearn Investments Mauritius Pte, has divested a 2.8 percent stake in restaurant operator Devyani International for _____.
What method is HDFC Bank using to sell its 100% stake in HDFC Education?