What is the position of R with respect to her grandmother?
S, mother of P is sitting opposite to the sister of P. 2. Daughter of P is sitting to third to right of sister of P. 3. T is sitting to the immediate left of sister of P. 4. Q is sitting to the immediate right of wife of P. Brother of P is sitting third to right of Q. Case-1 Next we have only 1 position left for placing P in all 3 arrangements as Case-1 P is sitting second to the right of daughter of T. T who is a male is sitting second to the right of mother of R. V is sitting second to the left of father of P. U is immediate neighbor of P. V has two children in different genders. So final arrangement Case-2 & 3 gets rejected as these both cases were not satisfied with 8th statement (as we know P is a male member) In case-1, P’s sister, P’s brother and P’s daughter were seated apart from Q. This implies Q must be son of P and the blood relation is shown below,
Which of the following is not true about powers of a president to promulgate an ordinance?
With reference to the Limitation Act, 1963 "limitation period for filing the suit for possession of immovable property based on previous possession and...
The Board shall, within ______ after the end of each financial year, submit to the Central Government a report in such form, as may be prescribed, givin...
When a new plaintiff is added to the suit after an interest has devolved on him in another suit, the suit shall be deemed to be instituted on behalf of...
Legal tender character of notes is provided under which section of the RBI Act, 1934?
Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 who are the persons who are authorized to investigate?
Which of the following entities cannot be an insurance company?
Any physical procedure, involving the intentional exposure of food to ionizing radiations is called
Who shall be responsible for inspection of food business, drawing samples and sending them to Food Analyst for analysis?
In the case of R vs Foster, the witness saw the accident and a speeding truck. In this case was his statement held as admissible?